![]() |
| Change the Color and Mascot and dream Seattle |
Much has been made recently of the Indianapolis Colts
possibly releasing future HOF QB Peyton Manning in the coming weeks. Indy holds
the #1 overall pick in April’s NFL Draft which everyone believes will be used
on Stanford QB Andrew Luck. Peyton is due $28Million roster bonus on March 8th,
and the neck injury that kept him out of action all season still isn’t at 100%.
All signs lead to Manning being the next QB to follow in the steps of Joe
Montana leaving San Francisco and joining the Kansas City Chiefs to end his HOF
career.
With all of this
talk about #18 hitting the open market NFL.com’s Jason La Canfora floated the
idea that the Seattle Seahawks, the Arizona Cardinals, and the Washington
Redskins would all be favorable and interested suitors for his one last shot at
a Super Bowl before he hangs up his cleats. Eli plays in New York so I don’t
see him wanting to go to Washington, and the Bidwills just shelled out a ton of
money for Kevin Kolb (a contract that I suppose they could get out of if they
wanted to) and are notoriously cheap owners, so that knocks the Cardinals out.
That leaves the Seattle Seahawks and the richest owner in the NFL, Paul Allen,
doing serious bidding for his services in this hypothetical free agency period.
How much sense does this make? As fans do we
want an aging and potentially injury prone Peyton Manning in Seattle? During
the regular season my answer might have been no. We were a semi-playoff
contender with Tarvaris Jackson at QB, we were on track to snag one of Matt
Barkley or Robert Griffin III in the draft, and I was fine with that. Draft
Barkley or RGIII and let Tarvaris handle the starter roll until one of those
guys is ready to go. When Barkley decided to stay at USC though, my perspective
changed.
Without Barkley,
the 2012 NFL draft is lacking in top end 1st round QBs. Luck and
RGIII are both going to go in the top 5-7. The way we’re building this team, I
don’t see Pete and John selling the farm to try to rise up to a point where
they could take Griffin. In that vein, you sign Peyton to a fair deal. His
injury concern is going to drive his price down a bit, but even so Seattle has
the cap room to make a splash if needed. He’s going to get a starter contract
that much is sure, but he’s not going to get the Brady/Breese contract like he
would have prior to his neck problems. Use the 11th overall pick on
a pass rush DE or OLB to shore up that weakness in the defense, then take a
flyer on a guy like Kirk Cousins or Brock Ossweiller in the 2nd
round to groom under Tarvaris who knows the system well and Peyton Manning who
is the most cerebral QB in the modern history of the NFL. With Manning under
center Seattle instantly becomes the favorites to win the NFC West, and is
probably getting press like in 2003 and 2004 when they were a trendy Super Bowl
pick.
What of the
negatives though? Signing Manning to a contract you assume that he walks in as
the starter from day 1, what does that say about Carroll’s comPETE mantra? How
would the locker room who is by all accounts firmly behind Tarvaris Jackson
feel about bringing Manning in? Then you have to look at what John and Pete
said about the way Tarvaris was treated in Minnesota during the Brett Favre
fiasco, would they be willing to risk the same type of situation here?
First off, this is
Peyton Manning, not Brett Favre. Tarvaris and everyone else in Seattle’s locker
room are professionals and I have to think that even Jackson’s best friends
like Sidney Rice would be absolutely giddy at the chance to catch passes from a
guy like Peyton. Most of the drama surrounding Favre centered around the way he
left Green Bay, and his antics about whether or not he would retire. We don’t have
that same situation with Manning. Peyton wants to stay a Colt if at all
possible, but the financials and his health, along with the whole sale change
in the coaching and front office might not make that possible. This isn’t a guy
forcing his release; this is a guy getting kicked out of his house.
My only real concern
with this deal is Peyton’s health, and his ability to thrive behind Seattle’s
young offensive line. Manning has played most of his career with an average at
best offensive line. His quick reads and lightning fast release have kept him
mostly injury free and clean over the course of his career. With Okung and
Unger playing at a high level all last season and a year of seasoning plus off
season workouts for Moffitt and Carpenter, this might be the most talented O
line Peyton has played with his entire career. Sure they’re young and need
improvement, but the talent is unmistakable.
One other thing to
think about, Peyton will never truly be a “Seahawk.” He will always be
remembered for his play in Indianapolis. When we win a Super Bowl with him as
the QB it will be all about him to the national media, not about how he came to
a team on the cusp and helped put them over the top. To ESPN it would be about
how Peyton took perennial door mat Seattle and turned them into champions.
Nobody will remember us beating New York on the road in 2011, or the way we
handled Baltimore. How we gave Dallas all they could handle, or went step for
step with and were the only team in the NFL to score a rushing TD on San
Francisco in week 16. All of that would be forgotten in the media love fest for
Peyton Manning. That 2005 team that came up short in SBXL? Conveniently
forgotten.
Is that worth the
price of a win in SBXLVII? I say yes. Who gives a damn what the talking heads
have to say? Do fans in Pittsburgh care that everyone thinks that at both of
their last Super Bowl wins are possibly tainted? You bet your ass they don’t!
To reach the pinnacle of football excellence would make almost anything worth
it to the players and the coaches and 98% of NFL fans. It’s all about the Super
Bowl. At the end of the season there are 31 teams that are disappointed. It
doesn’t matter how you get there or how you win, it only matters that you won.
What if we won 2 in
a row with Peyton? Can you believe the shit storm that would bring? It wouldn’t
be about Peyton anymore after that. It would be about how Indy wasted most of
his career with bad defenses and an inability to get a solid running game to
support him. It would be about how Seattle was the complete team lacking only a
QB to lead them to glory. Win two rings with Peyton and he’s no longer a Colt
for many people. After that, the Colts are the team that wasted him and the Seahawks
are the team that gave him his true place amongst the elite.
Seattle is a team
on the verge of greatness. The 2011 Seahawks were a few bounces away from
possibly a 10 or 11 win season. With Peyton at the helm we would have likely
seen 12 or 13. The defense is young, hungry, and all pro caliber. Earl Thomas
is 22. He’s starting in the pro-bowl on Sunday and was voted to the 2nd
team AP All-Pro team. Three quarters of the secondary in the Pro-Bowl are
Seahawks. We sent both of our backs to Hawaii in Marshawn Lynch, and Michael
Robinson. The NFL is a business. When it comes down to it, successful teams
make the right business decisions at the right time. They don’t hold onto or
favor players based upon their past performance for sentimental reasons. They
go out, and they lay down the money and they do what it takes to win and keep
winning. As long as he’s healthy and cleared to play, bringing Peyton Manning
to Seattle is a smart business decision. He instantly raises the play and the
expectations of every player on offense. Signing Peyton Manning at this point
is like when Jordan came out of retirement to win a few more rings with the
Bulls. Chicago was bad w/o Michael but they were the best in the NBA even after
he took a few years off of basketball. That is the impact Peyton Manning would
have.
There are good reasons to feel either way
about bringing Peyton Manning to the PNW. To me though, it feels like a
no-brainer. If he’s healthy, and we can do it without killing all of our cap
room, you have to do it. I would like to be the first to welcome our new
football overlord to Seattle. Free agency can’t come soon enough.

Great post! And I agree, IF he's healthy and IF he likes our situation we would have plenty of cap space. 34-36 million by some accounts.
ReplyDeleteDave, you, sir are a Seahomer, and I respect you for it, but man put down the method: you are so so so done.
ReplyDeleteOpinions are like assholes my friend, everyone has them, and they all tend to be full of shit.
ReplyDeleteI think Manning would be a great addition if the Seahawks had a chance to grab him. That being said, you still make it a competition just to make sure he's ready. This is the first time that Peyton has been out of action for any real time, so it would give him an extra edge to prepare for the season. Especially since there will be a full training camp though. They still need pass rushers though: Clemens isn't enough. I wouldn't be mad if they used the first pick or two on possible impact DEs who can get on the QB. Good read though!
ReplyDeleteGreat post, i agree with you totally. If Peyton came to seattle, with our weapons on offense and a young tough defense, it might be the best Seahawk team we've ever had
ReplyDelete